Human evolution

There is an abundance evidence that humans evolved on our planet. Australopithecus afarensis is considered the central species from which all later hominins evolved. The caves and quarries at Sterkfontein, 50 kilometers northwest of Johannesburg, South Africa, are a rich site for hominin fossils. Since the 1936 discovery of the first adult Australopithecus some 500 specimens have been recovered there .1

Homo erectus is another very well-known human species. Five hominin skulls were recovered from Dmanisi in Georgia, which are thought to represent a single regional variant of Homo erectus, or possibly a separate species, called Homo Georgicus. In addition, there are about 200 skeletal fragments that are attributed to about 40 individuals from Homo rudolfensis and its sister species, Homo habilis (2,4–1,5 million years ago).2

A species called Homo Naledi was discovered in the Rising Star cave system in South Africa between 2013 and 2014. It is most likely descended from Homo habilis, the first representative of the human species, 2 million years after habilis first appeared. More than 1500 fossils, representing at least 15 individuals of this species, have been excavated.3

At the Grand Dolina site in Spain, 80 skeletal remains belonging to six Homo antecessor individuals were found, along with 200 stone artifacts. At another site, Galeria, 6000 faunal remains were found along with stone tools and two hominid fossils. At Sima los Huesos, anthropologists have found 3000 human fossils belonging to 30 individuals and dated to about 300 000 years ago.4 Another human species, Homo cepranensis, is known only from a single skullcap discovered in Italy in 1994.

These are just some examples of human fossil discoveries. New discoveries are constantly made. Anthropologists can study these fossilized human remains and find out about their behavior, diet, and even cause of death. Lucy, for example, died from traumatic injuries after falling from a tree. Homo erectus often suffered from exostosis or osteoma, which is a benign growth of new bone on top of existing bone. Neanderthals frequently suffered from arthritis and tuberculosis of the spine.5 In one case, the skull of a male Homo erectus from 1.77 million years ago was found in Dmanisi, Georgia. The man had lost all but one of his teeth long before he died, causing much of his jaw to degenerate. This means that other m embers of the man’s group must have cared for him.

The Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History’s website gives the estimate that “From skeletons to teeth, early human fossils have been found for more than 6000 individuals.” Considering how many human beings have lived on this planet in total throughout human humanity, that number is tiny. But then, that’s to be expected.

Different human species have left their footprints on the planet. Footprints found on the Greek Mediterranean island of Crete show hominin-like characteristics. They have been dated to approximately 5.7 million years ago, making them the oldest known pre-human footprints. The tracks of Laetoli in northern Tanzania date from 3.6 million years ago. It is generally believed that they are the tracks of Australopithecines. The double trail of larger footprints represents two individuals, one walking in front of the other. The smaller of the two stepped intentionally into the tracks of the larger one. There are 1.5-million-year-old footprints from Ileret, Kenya. They were made by about 20 Homo erectus individuals. These footprints suggest that Homo erectus individuals lived and moved in cooperative groups. The total sample includes 97 hominin tracks. One set of footprints was found in Happisburgh, England, over 850 000 years ago. The hominins probably belonged to Homo antecessor, a European cousin of Homo erectus. The tallest individual at Happisburgh was an adult male. The smaller footprints were probably made by either female adults or children. One set of footprints, known as the “devil’s trails”, has been preserved in volcanic ash atop the Roccamonfina volcano in Italy. Recently, a team of anthropologists identified 87 Neanderthal footprints found on an ancient shoreline in Spain that date from about 300 000 years ago.

In 2021, a team of Chinese researchers discovered cave art estimated to be 169 000 to 226 000 years old. The artwork is a series of deliberately arranged handprints and footprints. It was recovered from a hot spring on the Tibetan Plateau at an altitude of 4269 meters above sea level. Based on the size and shape of the prints, it is believed that the artwork was created by children.6

Humans leave various types of tracks, many of which other life forms do not. Humans have developed a cumulative culture throughout their existence. For example, stone tools do not have to be fossilized to be preserved for our time. It was mentioned in chapter 4 that the number of Acheulean stone tools is in the hundreds of thousands. In total, there are millions of these tools, or “lithic artifacts”, that clearly display the intelligence of their makers. No animal makes these kinds of tools.

“A sizeable dataset comprising millions of lithic artifacts sampling over two million years of early paleolithic tool technology from Africa and Eurasia is now available”. Corbey 2020, 1

Anthropologists have discovered a variety of different knapping techniques and cultures among these tools. Tools 3.3 million years old were found recently found in Lomekwi, West Turkana, Kenya. They are associated with Australopithecus afarensis, the species of Lucy. Homo habilis developed the pebble core and flake technique, as shown by the Oldowan choppers. Acheulian bifacial handaxes and cleavers were used by Homo ergaster/erectus. The more sophisticated prepared-core Levallois tools were used by Homo Heidelbergensis. The Mousterian tool culture was produced by Neanderthals. In the Upper Paleolithic, our own species made the more sophisticated blade tools; scrapers, burins, and projectile points.8

Bone retouchers have been part of the human tool spectrum since the Lower Paleolithic. These tools were used to make or reshape used stone tools. These t ools were obtained by recycling the bones of butchered animals.9 For the more sophisticated Levallois tools, which required a lot of work to make, it may have been more economical to reshape the tools (if possible) than to make new ones.

Research on these tools is something that proponents of ID would probably call “messy”. Without industrial machinery, it is nearly impossible to reproduce the same tool twice. The humans who made these tools were not always so systematic in their approach that once they gained the ability to make, say, Levallois tools and spears, they never made simpler tools again. This probably depended on necessity and the situation at hand.

During human evolution, tools have become smaller and more complex, being handled largely by the whole hand in the earliest technological stages, then by the fingers, and finally with the fingertips. Although prehistoric archaeology has long relied on fixed typological models, it must be noticed that the variation of these tool types, both in terms of geography and chronology, is generally large, and their function is not always clear. Some of these tools may have been handled, furthermore, through hafting. In general, later tools do not entirely replace but coexist with former and more archaic technologies.10

The ingenuity of ancient humans is evidenced by archaeological finds in Java, Indonesia. Homo erectus used pointed objects such as shark teeth to open live mollusks to access their flesh. To open the mollusks, the movement had to be rotating and properly placed on the anterior adductor muscle. This required a great deal of manual dexterity and knowledge of mollusk anatomy.11

Hominin fossils and lithic artifacts are found near fossilized mammal bones. The bones often have cut marks caused by the lithic artifacts when cutting the flesh and extracting the fat from the bones. Abrasions caused by the use of tools can be distinguished from impressions left by human and animal teeth. In caves where humans lived and fed, such animal remains can be found en masse. For example, in the cave of Lazaret, France, researchers found more than 70 000 animal remains.12

The cave systems in the Cradle of Humankind area also have several episodes of the deposition of human and animal remains. Cut marks, percussion marks, and burned bones show that hominins accumulated the animal remains of Swartkrans.13 According to the archaeological and ethnological records, after scavenging or hunting, hunters would disarticulate the carcasses, flesh them out, and percuss the bones to extract marrow. During this process, the tools used by humans probably pressed against the animal bones, resulting in cut marks. These cut marks are clear evidence that early humans processed animals for food. These cut marks can help anthropologists understand the diet, hunting, and scavenging patterns of human ancestors. These marks can also be used to investigate whether carnivores or hominins held the upper hand in their competition over carcasses against other predators.14

 

Man learned to make fire, even though it took perhaps a million years to master this skill. Mastery gave our ancestors warmth, protection from predators at night, and the ability to cook food. The earliest evidence of fire use dates to about 1.7 million years ago in China, while it did not become regular and habitual until about 350 000 years ago. Nevertheless, humans have sometimes inhabited the same caves for hundreds of thousands of years without interruption. Therefore, they have left a variety of evidence of their deliberate use of fire. Fires were kept in the same place, leaving pit structures and charcoal surrounded by stones. Soot and smoke have left traces on the walls and ceiling of the cave. Anthropologists have found hardened wood, burned deposits of bones, shells, seeds, and food, rocks fragmented by fire, burned stone artifacts, baked clay, and ash accumulations.15

A n important site for analysis of human occupation of temperate areas is Zhoukoudian (literally “Dragon Bone Hill”), a cave located 43 kilometers southwest of Beijing, China. Research has brought to light the remains of more than 40 hominins. The 14 skull caps, 6 cranial bones, 10 jaw fragments, 147 teeth, and various arm, leg, and hand bones found at Zhoukoudian all appear to be from Homo erectus. Zhoukoudian may have been a base camp from which hominins hunted and brought back their prey for cooking and consumption. The site includes hundreds of thousands of animal bones, mainly from deer, but also from elephants, rhinoceroses, beavers, bison, boar, and horses.16 At the site, there were many hearths and ash layers, all well stratified in a deposit an astonishing 50 meters deep. On this one site alone, a whopping 100 000 stone tools were found.

Cumulative Cultural Brain

The cultural brain hypothesis claims that our big brains have been created for cultural learning. Humans create an intricate and complex culture, which correlates with changes in their cognition. This hypothesis says that our ancestors generated an expanding body of cultural know-how. In human history, survival has depended on our ability to gather food, weather the weather, conceive children, and take care of them. To serve this purpose, they made tools, hunted, collected, and processed plants, made fire, cooked, and constructed shelters. This cultural evolution created the key selection pressures driving human evolution. Humans have been selected for their ability to acquire, adopt, gather, apply, adapt, store, and transmit cultural knowledge and skills. Skillful cultural creators and managers were at a reproductive advantage over others.

Tool production was one of several complexes, actively taught and transmitted cultural skills employed by humans. Our ancestors employed a variety of stone technologies suited for carving up carcasses, scraping skins, and woodworking. These tools were often used and modified in a way that kept them functioning across multiple tasks.

Our hunter-gatherer ancestors hunted cooperatively. They had to know about the local climate, the terrain they hunted on, and the patchiness of food resources. They needed to know what kind of animals were ahead of them. The species, age, sex, how they behaved, and how fast the animals could move. However, the predominant source of food was not always animal proteins, but plants, nuts, and berries. Plant gathering and processing was a culture of its own.

Over a very long time, human ancestors also learned to create and control fire. This was essential for cooking, warmth, and social life. Making and maintaining a fire required technical skills, cooperation, and planning.

Our ancestors’ continuity would have necessitated knowing what the best materials for tools were, where the most nutritious plants were located and how they could be used for food, and when the seasons changed. Survival has demanded that we construct a more comprehensive understanding of the world.

Important cultural know-how, practices, and skills had to be actively passed on from generation to generation. Teaching guaranteed that the adopted skills and knowledge were stored reliably. Humans do not need to try all options to find the best solution. They can use the best one found so far, as soon as they learn about it. When innovations are not lost, they tend to accumulate. This has been called the "ratchet effect”. People improve on the ways things are done, sometimes even by mistake. Cultural innovations are deliberately developed, resulting in increased sophistication of the acquired culture. Cultural accumulation was dependent on the existence of morally upright societies in which people were capable of gathering new knowledge, developing their tools and skills, and tutoring others.

There is a positive feedback loop associated with culture: as culture accumulates, it aids individuals toward more cognitive evolution. As human cognition evolves, individuals become more able to create culture. We benefit from those who came before us and expanded on knowledge and culture, as well as from those, who are doing the same simultaneously with us. We see this today when our advancing culture contributes to the growth of the average IQ. This is known as the Flynn effect.

 

1Martini et al 2003, 48.

2Schrenk et al 2007, 1611.

3Berger et al 2017, 2.

4Arsuaga et al 2000.

5Theodorakopoulou&Karamanou 2020.

6Ashton 2021; Hatala et al 2016; Gierlinski et al 2017; Yirka 2021.

7Corbey 2020, 1.

9Martellotta et al 2020, 227.

10Bruner et al 2022, 6.

11Joordens et al 2014.

12Valensi 2000, 361.

13Berger et al 2017, 10.

14Zhang et al 2009; Ferraro et al 2013.

15Cornelio et al 2016; Zhong et al 2014.

16Wenke&Olszewski 2007, 142-143.

Source list:

Arsuaga, J. & Lorenzo, Carlos & Martínez, Ignacio & Gracia, Ana & Carretero, José & García, Nuria & López-Polín, Lucía

2000 The Atapuerca human fossils. Human Evolution. 15. 75-82.

Ashton, Nick

2021 Steps from History: The Happisburgh Footprints and Their Connections with the Past. In:Reading Prehistoric Human Tracks. Springer.

Berger, Lee & Hawks, John & Dirks, Paul & Elliott, Marina & Roberts, Eric.

2017 Homo Naledi and Pleistocene Hominin Evolution in Subequatorial Africa. eLife. 6.

Bruner, Emiliano & Battaglia-Mayer, Alexandra & Caminiti, Roberto

2022 The parietal lobe evolution and the emergence of material culture in the human genus. Brain Structure and Function. 1-23.

Corbey, Raymond

2020 Baldwin Effects in Early Stone Tools. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews. 29.

Cornélio, Alianda Maira & Navarrete, Ruben Ernesto & Brum, Ricardo & Queiroz, Claudio & Costa, Marcos

2016 Human Brain Expansion during Evolution Is Independent of Fire Control and Cooking. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 10.

Joordens, Josephine & d'Errico, Francesco & Wesselingh, Frank & Munro, Stephen & Vos, John & Wallinga, Jakob & Ankjærgaard, Christina & Reimann, Tony & Wijbrans, Jan R. & Kuiper, K.F. & Mücher, Herman & Coqueugniot, Hélène & Prié, Vincent & Joosten, Ineke & Van Os, Bertil & Schulp, Anne & Panuel, Michel & Haas, Victoria & Lustenhouwer, Wim & Roebroeks, Wil

2014 Homo Erectus at Trinil on Java Used Shells for Tool Production and Engraving. Nature. Advance Online Publication.

Martellotta, Eva Francesca & Delpiano, Davide & Govoni, Mirka & Nannini, Nicola & Duches, Rossella & Peresani, Marco

2003 Martini, Jacques & E, Wipplinger & F.J, Moen & Keyser, André. Contribution to the speleology of Sterkfontein Cave, Gauteng Province, South Africa. International Journal of Speleology. 32. 

2020 The use of bone retouchers in a Mousterian context of Discoid lithic technology. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences. 12.

Schrenk, Friedemann & Kullmer, Ottmar & Bromage, Timothy

2007 The Earliest Putative Homo Fossils. In Handbook of Paleoanthropology. Vol 3: Phylogeny of Hominids. Editors: Henke W, Rothe H, Tattersall I. Springer-Verlag.

Theodorakopoulou, Katerina; Karamanou, Marianna

2020 Human Paleopathology During the Stone Age. Archives of the Balkan Medical Union. 55. 11-18.

Valensi, Patricia

2000 The archaeozoology of Lazaret Cave (Nice, France). International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. 10. 357-367.

Wenke, Robert J&Olszewski, Deborah J.

2007 Patterns in Prehistory - Humankind's First Three Million Years. 5Th Ed. New York, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Zhang, Yue & Chunxue, Wang & Zhang, Shuangquan & Gao, Xing

2009 Cut Marks and Terminal Pleistocene Hominids in the Ma’anshan Site: Evidence for Meat-Eating. Chinese Science Bulletin. 54. 3872-3879.

How do the creationists respond to the abundance of evidence of human evolution. Did the devil conjur the evidence to make it seem that humans evolved and were not the special creation of God?