Biblical...err, Mahabharata Archaeology

It's clear that many of the events in the Old Testament are based on real history. Archaeologists have been able to verify numerous places, cultural practices and people mentioned in the Old Testament. There is solid archaeological evidence that the kingdoms of Judah and Israel existed in the modern areas of Israel and Palestine about 3000 years ago. There is evidence that at least some of the population came to the promised land from Egypt. Later, the kingdoms of Judah and Israel were conquered by their enemies: the Assyrians, the Babylonians, the Persians, the Greeks, and the Romans. 

The Nag Hammadi Library, The 'Ain Dara Temple, The New 'Ain Dara Temple, The Tel Dan ("David") Stela, Mona Lisa of the Galilee, "Yahweh and His Asherah": The Kuntillet 'Ajrud Ostraca (inscribed potsherd), St. Peter's House, The Siloam Pool, Ashkelon's Arched Gate, Jerusalem's Stepped-Stone Structure, Jerusalem's Babylonian Siege Tower are mentioned as the "Ten Top Biblical Archaeology Discoveries (Biblical Archaeology Society, 2011). 

Many believers use these discoveries as evidence for their religion, the Bible, and the existence of God. However, there is nothing surprising or miraculous about the fact that some biblical stories have a real background in history. We must ask ourselves: What can archaeology actually prove? How can you prove the supernatural or God through archaeology?

Archaeological evidence almost inevitably falls far short of proving the existence of the supernatural. We cannot dig up ancient Babylonian cities to prove the reality of their creator god, Marduk, or ancient Greek cities to prove the reality of Zeus. The pyramids aren't proof that Isis and Osiris were actually living beings. There is no ancient god or religion that shouldn't be considered real when the only evidence needed is the ruins of the dwellings or religious objects of the believers. All archaeology can show is that these people believed in their gods.

To illustrate my point, it may be helpful to draw a parallel with the Hindu epic, the Mahabharata. Like modern Jews and Christians with the Bible, many Hindus believe these epics, in which their avatars interact with humans and perform innumerable supernatural feats, are backed by archaeological evidence.

The Mahabharata (Great Story of the Bharatas) is the longest epic in the world—four times longer than the Christian Bible. It deals with the feud and eventual massive war on the Indian peninsula, involving millions of soldiers between the two sides of King Bharata’s family. The Mahabharata tells of a long power struggle between two rival families, the Pandavas and the Kauravas. Both families are descendants of a king named Bharata, whose name is derived from an early name for India. The Mahabharata is an ancient mythical story whose heroes include many gods such as Indra, Agni, and Shiva, demons and demonesses, demigods, and celestial sages. During battles. a Vimana, flying ship, is propelled by King Shalwa, who hurls lightning from the sky, causing explosions and decimating entire cities and their armies.

The most prominent god in the story is Lord Krishna, who served the Pandavas as a non-combating adviser and strategist. In Hinduism, Krishna is the Supreme Personality of the Godhead, the creator of the world, and the reason for whatever happens in the world, much like Jesus in Christianity. He is the “beginning, the middle, as also the end of all beings” (Gita 10:20). Krishna is also the main character of the Bhagavad Gita, a philosophical dialogue between the Pandava prince Arjuna and himself, driving Arjuna’s chariot.

                    Conservative Hindus believe their epics can be proven through archaeology just as much Christians do their Bible.

Both Hindu epics contain many references to places throughout India that have since become pilgrimage sites. Therefore, many Hindus believe that these stories are provable by historical evidence. For example, many believe that the city of Dwarka, described in the Mahabharata, has been found at the bottom of the Indian Ocean. In this city, King Salva attacked Krishna with a flying machine. According to Devi Vanamali (a “scholar-devotee”) this discovery is significant because it removes doubts about the historicity of the Mahabharata. The city was magnificent, with a great gate and large gardens and fortresses, and had a population of 10 000. It was a great port city with connections to other countries, but it was destroyed by a tsunami or a hurricane. For Vanamali, this discovery is valid evidence that Krishna's life is not pure myth. If Dwaraka existed, so did Krishna, she claims. 

On the other hand, the Mahabharata war took place on the battlefield of Kurukshetra in northern India, near Delhi. None of the bodies of the millions of soldiers who fought in the Mahabharata War were found there. No vimanas or clear evidence of massive warfare have been found. To the fundamentalist Hindu, this is of no consequence. To everyone else, it matters a great deal. 

To return to the topic of the Old Testament, there is ample evidence that the Old Testament has a historical basis. Events, people, places, and practices can be confirmed by archaeological and textual evidence. Voices from bushes, talking snakes and donkeys, the Sun standing still in the sky, or people being raised from the dead can not be proven through archeeology.

By this kind of logic, the ruins of a temple in Norway built to honor Thor and Odin would prove that these Old Norse gods were real. We could support this “Norse God archaeology” with stories about these gods recorded centuries ago by people who believed in them. Snorri Sturluson (1179–1241 CE) was an Icelandic historian, poet, and politician who is believed to have written parts of the Prose Edda, which is a major source for Norse mythology. We have archaeological evidence that the ancient Norse people believed in Thor and Odin; we have stories based on those beliefs. Is this not positive evidence for the existence of Thor and Odin?

The Old Testament forgets to mention two essential words when talking about God. "They believed". The ancient Israelites and Judeans believed that God had commanded the destruction of the Canaanites, caused the Great Flood and elected Cyrus. They interpreted their world by looking at it through their belief in the supernatural and the God of Israel. This was their lens of faith. Read more about this in my book.

King David existed, therefore the whole world was supernaturally flooded a few thousand years ago after a 600-year-old man who gathered a pair of all the animals of the world into a single wooden boat at God's command. Got it.

The footprints of a Hindu god, Lord Hanuman, a character from another Hindu epic, the Ramayana. They have been found all over Asia. Solid evidence of the existence of the monkey god, right?

Create Your Own Website With Webador